|
"Does
Longevity Cause Growth? A Theoretical Critique", 2006, Journal of Economic Growth,
11, 363-76.
(joint with
Moshe Hazan)
Abstract:
This
paper challenges conventional wisdom by arguing that greater
longevity may have contributed less than previously thought for the
significant accumulation of human capital during the transition from
stagnation to growth. This is because when parents make choices over
the quantity and quality of their offspring, greater longevity
positively affects not only the returns to quality but also the returns
to quantity. The theory suggests that in contrast to longevity,
improvements in health are more likely to generate quantityquality
tradeoff. Finally, it shows the importance of controlling for fertility
when empirically examining the impact of children’s health on
their education.
"Talent
Utilization, a Source of Bias in
Measuring
TFP", SSRN
Working Paper, 2006.
Abstract:
This paper analyzes a
model of economic growth that
explains differences in economic structure across countries. It
highlights the interplay between productivity, talents utilization and
entrepreneurship incentives. The paper has two main results. First, it
argues that, when measuring human capital, we ignore one dimension,
which is "talents utilization". It is suggested then that, in
development accounting, human capital is inaccurately measured. Second,
it shows that the magnitude of talents utilization increases with the
level of development. Thus, the paper suggests that talents utilization
amplifies differences in productivity and contributes to the
explanation of large observed international differences in per-capita
income.
"Exporting
Female Labor Content or Substituting it", SSRN
Working Paper, 2009.
(joint with
Philip Sauré)
Abstract:
An expansion or contraction in a sector
intensively
using female labor must affect female labor force participation. We
suggest that, whenever trade and international specialization expand
sectors prone to employing females, female labor force participation
actually drops, and vice versa. In general, when sectors prone to
employing females expand, sectors tending towards male employment must
contract. This contraction, in turn, induces male workers to migrate to
the expanding sectors, which, in our specification, drives female
workers out of formal employment. In this sense, a country that is
exporting female labor content is, in fact, substituting male labor for
female labor. Finally, we show that our mechanism also applies in a
case of technological change that is biased towards female labor.
|