Thesis defence Customary International Law and Human Rights Law: An Impossible Relationship? Exploring Customary International Law's "Vitality Paradox" Add to calendar 2021-10-18 14:30 2021-10-18 16:30 Europe/Rome Customary International Law and Human Rights Law: An Impossible Relationship? Sala degli Stemmi and on Zoom YYYY-MM-DD Print Share: Share on Facebook Share on BlueSky Share on X Share on LinkedIn Send by email Scheduled dates Oct 18 2021 14:30 - 16:30 CEST Sala degli Stemmi and on Zoom Organised by Department of Law During her PhD thesis defence, Maia Titberidze will explore more closely the possible interaction of customary international law and international human rights law. Custom remains a widely discussed source of international law even if its unwritten nature has raised more questions than it has provided answers. At the same time, rarely do discussions regarding customary international law (CIL) transcend the more traditional boundaries of public international law into its newer branches, such as international human rights law (IHRL). When discussions do transcend such boundaries, IHRL is often discarded as unsuited to be informed through custom.In this context the thesis identifies and zooms onto what it calls custom’s vitality paradox — its persistence in the practice of international law despite the multiple challenges raised in the scholarship. To see whether this paradox also manifests itself in the field of IHRL, the thesis addresses the case law of judicial bodies that apply international human rights law. It demonstrates that the sceptical discourse on CIL in general, as well as in respect of IHRL in particular, has not played out in practice. To better locate and understand this vitality paradox and explore its implications for the theory and the practice of CIL identification, the thesis traces the specificities of custom and its identification by drawing analogies with custom’s operation in Roman law, civil law before its codification, and common law. As a result, a necessary link between custom and dispute settlement and the multiple-participant process of identification centred around the latter is uncovered. This view of custom identification offers intrinsic safeguards against the feared degeneration of custom into (judicial) wishful thinking and is equally applicable to the field of human rights law. Building on these findings, the thesis concludes with exploring the specificities of IHRL to determine how it should be informed by means of custom without unduly stretching its scope.The Zoom link will be sent to online participants upon registration by Monday morning, 18th October 2021. Related events Read more Thesis defence 14 Dec 2021 15:00 - 17:00 CET Outside EUI premises, ZOOM Thesis defence Department of Law The Use of External Judicial Decisions by Regional Human Rights Courts
Read more Thesis defence 14 Dec 2021 15:00 - 17:00 CET Outside EUI premises, ZOOM Thesis defence Department of Law The Use of External Judicial Decisions by Regional Human Rights Courts