Thesis defence Contributions of Victims’ Procedural Rights to Gender Justice in International Criminal Law The Case of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia Add to calendar 2023-06-12 09:30 2023-06-12 11:30 Europe/Rome Contributions of Victims’ Procedural Rights to Gender Justice in International Criminal Law Sala degli Stemmi and Zoom YYYY-MM-DD Print Share: Share on Facebook Share on BlueSky Share on X Share on LinkedIn Send by email Scheduled dates Jun 12 2023 09:30 - 11:30 CEST Sala degli Stemmi and Zoom Organised by Department of Law PhD thesis defence by Marie Wilmet This research lies at the intersection of two topical and debated areas in international criminal law. First, the emergence of victims’ rights in the procedural laws of international and hybrid criminal courts. Second, the challenges in providing accountability for sexual and gender-based violence (‘SGBV’). By connecting these debates, this thesis investigates the contributions of victims’ procedural rights to gender justice in international criminal law. This research first develops a new model of gender justice composed of four branches: the recognition of SGBV crimes, the participation of SGBV victims, the reparation of gendered harms, and court culture. Second, it investigates the validity of this model through an empirical case study of the Extraordinary Chambers in the Courts of Cambodia’s Case 002/02. Case 002/02 is significant for gender justice, as it is the only international criminal case to date which combines a definitive conviction for SGBV crimes, the participation of SGBV victims in its proceedings, as well as the ordering and implementation of reparations. By associating doctrinal legal research with participant observation, documentary, and archival research, as well as qualitative interviews conducted with professionals and SGBV civil parties, this research confirms that victims’ procedural rights can contribute to the four branches of gender justice. Nevertheless, SGBV victims’ capacity to impact gender justice outcomes and processes is far from unlimited and depends on multiple factors influencing a court’s culture.