Research Findings and Outcomes
- Transnational Mobility is a niche phenomenon concerning a very small number of usually highly educated migrants. It develops out of desire or necessity and it takes different forms in different phases of a person’s life and migration trajectory. It may be a strategy of necessity (to complement income or feel ‘at home’) or a strategy of expansion and creation (to increase income or help others).
- Regularisation and acquisition of long-term status determines migrants’ transnational mobility (frequency, duration of stay) and the ease with which they can move between origin and destination developing their economic or civic project.
- Integration in the host society facilitates transnational engagement. It enables accumulation of material and social networking resources that can then be invested in the country of origin. It also provides security that maximizes the chances for success/accomplishment of the transnational investment. Finally, it permits return to the country of destination at any point in time.
- Family motives are a powerful driver of transnational mobility. Plans to return, and particularly retirement plans, constitute the most dynamic catalysts for transnational economic engagement including travelling back and forth to repair a house or set up some small business (e.g. a shop or restaurant).
- Transnational mobility is not directly associated with transnational engagement. In other words, individuals who are highly mobile between two (or more) locations may be intensely economically engaged in either or both locations, or, they may have minimal economic engagement. Similarly, individuals who are largely immobile may on the contrary be intensely active transnationally via their engagement in NGOs, or investments followed closely by family members.
- Specific socio-economic and political conditions at destination or origin affect different groups differently. For example, the economic crisis in Italy and Spain led to a deterioration of the migrants’ actual situation and future prospects and encouraged the pursuit of alternative or complementary investment of resources in the country of origin for certain population groups (Moroccans), but less for others (Indians or Filipinos). However, a change in local political situation in countries of origin such as Bosnia and Ukraine became a more powerful integration/transnationalism factor than the global economic crisis.
- Transnationally mobile migrants generate social remittances. They disseminate new ideas and socio-cultural practices in both origin and destination countries.
Key Messages for Policy Makers
- Transnational mobility concerns a small number of migrants, but it can be beneficial both to the migrants and to the destination and origin countries. In addition to facilitating the transfer of financial resources it can increase social remittances, notably civic projects promoting social solidarity or democracy, the diffusion of new ideas and alternative lifestyles.
- Transnational mobility could be sustained and encouraged through policy measures enabling portability of welfare and pension rights and facilitating transnational entrepreneurship through bilateral agreements.
- Transnational mobility could also be a factor in healing divided societiessuch as ethnic and religious groups in Bosnia. The engagement of their diaspora in political and civic projects and the mobility between different countries of destination (e.g. UK or Austria) and Bosnia could promote politics of reconciliation and democratic consolidation as well as foster investment and socio-economic development.
Ideas for Further Research
- Study of migrants’ families at country of origin in order to assess how they receive transfers and enable or obstruct the remitting migrant’s transnational mobility.
- Study transnational mobility patterns over longer periods of time to capture the life history dimension and better analyse how transnational mobility relates to migrant integration.
European University Institute, Florence
Real Instituto Elcanto, Madrid
London Metropolitan University, London
International Centre for Migration Policy Development (ICMPD), Vienna
Country Reports (2015):
- Austria, Alexandra König, Bernhard Perchinig, Jimy Perumadan, Katharina Schaur
- Italy, Ruby Gropas, Laura Bartolini, Anna Triandafyllidou
- Spain, Carmen Gonzáles Enríquez, Jóse Pablo Martinez Romera
- United Kingdom, Eugenia Markova, Sonia McKay
Policy Brief (2015):
Research Project Reports :
- 25 September, Regional Workshop (with presentations), ‘Mobilising Diasporas: Bosnian – Herzegovinans and Ukrainians in the UK and Austria’, London Metropolitan University, Brighton (UK)
- 18 September, Regional Workshop (with presentations), ‘Transnational migration from Morocco to Italy and Spain: profiles and prospects’, Real Instituto Elcano, Madrid (Spain)